منابع مشابه
Fibring Non-Truth-Functional Logics: Completeness Preservation
Fibring has been shown to be useful for combining logics endowed with truthfunctional semantics. However, the techniques used so far are unable to cope with fibring of logics endowed with non-truth-functional semantics as, for example, paraconsistent logics. The first main contribution of the paper is the development of a suitable abstract notion of logic, that may also encompass systems with n...
متن کاملTruth Preservation in Context and in Its Place∗
∗Earlier versions of the material in this paper have been presented in 2006 at the Friday Seminar (University of St Andrews), where Sujan Riyadh gave a valuable response; in 2008, at the Arché Philosophy of Logic Seminar (University of St Andrews); in 2010, at the 3 Arché Foundations of Logical Consequence Workshop on Propositions, Context and Consequence (University of St Andrews); in 2011, at...
متن کاملRamsey on Truth and Truth on Ramsey
It is widely held, to the point of being the received interpretation, that Frank Ramsey was the first to defend the so-called Redundancy Theory of Truth in his landmark article ‘Facts and Propositions’ (hereafter ‘FP’) of 1927. For instance, A.J. Ayer cited this article in the context of arguing that saying that p is true is simply a way of asserting p and that truth is not a real quality or re...
متن کاملon semihypergroups and hypergroups
in this thesis, first the notion of weak mutual associativity (w.m.a.) and the necessary and sufficient condition for a $(l,gamma)$-associated hypersemigroup $(h, ast)$ derived from some family of $lesssim$-preordered semigroups to be a hypergroup, are given. second, by proving the fact that the concrete categories, semihypergroups and hypergroups have not free objects we will introduce t...
15 صفحه اولTruth and Fundamentality: on Merricks’s Truth and Ontology
Truth and Ontology is a lively book, brimming with arguments, and drawing the reader towards the radical conclusion that what is true does not depend on what there is. If there is a central line of argument, it is that the best account of truthmaking requires truths to be about their truthmakers, but negative existentials, modals, and claims about the past and future are not about what is, but ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Australasian Journal of Logic
سال: 2015
ISSN: 1448-5052
DOI: 10.26686/ajl.v12i3.2045